drirshad
07-23 03:55 AM
As long as she was ni status should be fine, not sure if they look into tax returns and u guys didnt show much ....
wallpaper I adore fair hair and think it
sanjay05
01-29 12:26 PM
I had infopass appointment yesterday at Dallas. I am waiting for my FP (Check my signature). It was rather simple. They checked the id and the appointment at the outside window and issued a token for me and my spouse (I went alone but took appointment for 2). By the time I cleared security and went inside I already had my token number announced. The IO asked me the reason I was visiting and she checked the 485 notice, punched in something in her system and said you should receive your FP notice within 30 days. She did same for my spouse. I was in and out of the building in 10 mins.
seemakumar
06-25 12:11 AM
I had a H1b visa but never travelled to US.My visa got cancelled without prejudice when i left the organization.My new employer filed l1b individual on my behalf.i129 was denied by uscis stating that i am a skilled worker but do not possess specialized knowledge.Moreover the position in US is that of a software engineer & does not require any specialized knowledge.Please note that I hold a Bachelor of Engineering degree(BE) in Electronics & Telecommunications with about 5 years of IT experience.
* Does this mean my visa is denied?
* What options do i have next?
* Will this affect my further applications?
* Does this mean my visa is denied?
* What options do i have next?
* Will this affect my further applications?
2011 Her hair is a soft rown with
dr_serious
10-09 10:19 AM
I'm looking for a tutorial or a little code that can help me to move an object around by using the keyboard arrows or other letters.
I googled already but I didn't find anything.
thx, I'm trying to lurn silverlight on my own by making games in Blend 4.
I think there is a future in silverlight!
Fr�
I googled already but I didn't find anything.
thx, I'm trying to lurn silverlight on my own by making games in Blend 4.
I think there is a future in silverlight!
Fr�
more...
jimusa
03-07 09:04 PM
Hi,
I am being told by my employer that Prevailing wage applies for the hours from the start of an employment to the end of the year irrespective of any vacations.
I joined my current company in Feb 2010 and went to India for 1.5 months in Oct-Nov and came back, My prevailing wage hours is calculated from Feb 2010 till the end of the year ignoring the break I took when in India. So, even if I am paid for only the hours I worked here, I have to match the Prevailing wages based upon the hrs from Feb 10 till Dec end 2010.
They want me to pay them the difference as I had a low billing rate and my total earning is lower than the prevailing wage based upon this calculation.
I don't see sufficient information on the web for this clause.
Please help.
Thanks
Jimmy
I am being told by my employer that Prevailing wage applies for the hours from the start of an employment to the end of the year irrespective of any vacations.
I joined my current company in Feb 2010 and went to India for 1.5 months in Oct-Nov and came back, My prevailing wage hours is calculated from Feb 2010 till the end of the year ignoring the break I took when in India. So, even if I am paid for only the hours I worked here, I have to match the Prevailing wages based upon the hrs from Feb 10 till Dec end 2010.
They want me to pay them the difference as I had a low billing rate and my total earning is lower than the prevailing wage based upon this calculation.
I don't see sufficient information on the web for this clause.
Please help.
Thanks
Jimmy
godspeed
06-28 01:33 PM
hmm, not sure why this is not displayed
more...
ektha123
12-24 07:57 PM
I got H1 this year. I was applied my ssn on oct 9 th. still i didn't get my ssn number. two days back ssn people called and told that "in online it is showing your EAd card. so we can give u ssn if you bring the EAD card". My question is if i give my EAD, will the h1 get cancelled. please suggest me.
2010 Chunky highlights (Sarah
gondalguru
07-08 05:19 PM
Hi
I filed my 485 on June 4th 2007 with NSC. It was transferred to TSC and received my Receipt notice. Now I am going to file my AP.
My question is where should I file my AP?. Do I need to file with NSC or TSC?.
Please someone respond.
Thanks in advance
TSC
I filed my 485 on June 4th 2007 with NSC. It was transferred to TSC and received my Receipt notice. Now I am going to file my AP.
My question is where should I file my AP?. Do I need to file with NSC or TSC?.
Please someone respond.
Thanks in advance
TSC
more...
sinha
01-06 09:14 PM
Hi!
I traveled to India and came back on 22nd Feb'2009. I am on EAD and travelled on AP.
At the immigration, I got I-94, which the officer stamped till Feb 21, 2010 (parolled until). However, my EAD is valid till (7th August,2010) 08/07/2010 (mm/dd/yyyy).I got my AP renewed till Dec'2010. Shall I be concerned about my I-94 till Feb21, 2010 (need to renew it?) or it doesn't matter as my AP is renewed and will renew my EAD 3 months before it expires? Pls answer.
Thanks.
I traveled to India and came back on 22nd Feb'2009. I am on EAD and travelled on AP.
At the immigration, I got I-94, which the officer stamped till Feb 21, 2010 (parolled until). However, my EAD is valid till (7th August,2010) 08/07/2010 (mm/dd/yyyy).I got my AP renewed till Dec'2010. Shall I be concerned about my I-94 till Feb21, 2010 (need to renew it?) or it doesn't matter as my AP is renewed and will renew my EAD 3 months before it expires? Pls answer.
Thanks.
hair Dark Brown Hair With Bronze
Blog Feeds
05-25 03:10 AM
Indian-born Karan Kler is the executive director of the Coachella Valley Immigration Service and Assistance Inc., a nonprofit immigration counseling agency in Palm Springs, California. My friend Dan Kowalski forwarded me a really nice article on Karan's journey from an influential business and military family in India to heading a non-profit agency assisting immigrants in need.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/05/immigrant-of-the-day-karan-kler-immigrant-advocate.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/05/immigrant-of-the-day-karan-kler-immigrant-advocate.html)
more...
Blog Feeds
07-27 03:40 PM
A Federal Judge has certified a nationwide class in a challenge to the USCIS's restrictive interpretation of the "automatic conversion" clause in the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA) of 2002. This opens the way for children who have "aged-out" to be reunited with their parents. The USCIS has resisted implementing this important section of law for the past seven years. Just a few weeks ago, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), in Matter of Wang, adopted the government's restrictive interpretation of the automatic conversion clause. On July 16, Federal Judge James Selna (Central District, California), over government objections, made his...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/07/cspa-update.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2009/07/cspa-update.html)
hot Blonde Highlights: F: COLOR
Blog Feeds
02-23 09:00 AM
On February 18 and 19, the University of California (Irvine) hosted a symposium where many of U.S. immigration's Rock-Star professors came together to try and solve "Persistent Puzzles in Immigration Law." The topics covered a wide expanse. A subject discussed that particularly interested me is Congress's often inexplicable delegation of regulatory authority among a surfeit of federal agencies that administer and enforce the immigration laws, each with its area of real (or presumed) expertise and overlapping responsibilities. One speaker mentioned her concern about the possible mis-use of E-Verify by some employers to screen current or would-be workers for employment eligibility,...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2011/02/time-for-congress-to-streamline-the-h-1b-visa-process.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2011/02/time-for-congress-to-streamline-the-h-1b-visa-process.html)
more...
house light brown hair with golden
smuggymba
09-21 10:37 AM
Mods - Please delete this thread; this has nothing to do with immigration. You can discuss this on ibnlive
tattoo highlights for rown hair
pvpb
10-15 07:04 PM
Hi Guys,
All my checks got cashed on friday....today my lawyer office got a notice saying that there is no FP fee eventhough they cashed it.
they asked to resubmit the fees again...my lawyer said he will work it out with them..
My questions is I filed to NSC, transfered to VSc and today they status says it has been transfered to TSC :confused:
So should i submit this evidence to VSC or TSC.
Please clarify.
venkat/
All my checks got cashed on friday....today my lawyer office got a notice saying that there is no FP fee eventhough they cashed it.
they asked to resubmit the fees again...my lawyer said he will work it out with them..
My questions is I filed to NSC, transfered to VSc and today they status says it has been transfered to TSC :confused:
So should i submit this evidence to VSC or TSC.
Please clarify.
venkat/
more...
pictures Brown complexions have a bit
leoindiano
03-18 10:55 AM
Huggi,
under OPT you are still on F1 Visa...If you join another degree, you can still have F1, I believe you just need to inform the university on which your visa was issued about the university transfer. International affairs at your new univ. should help in this regard.
under OPT you are still on F1 Visa...If you join another degree, you can still have F1, I believe you just need to inform the university on which your visa was issued about the university transfer. International affairs at your new univ. should help in this regard.
dresses golden brown hair
.jpg "hair Brown Hair Blonde")
Blog Feeds
01-24 07:50 AM
A fat report and one with some helpful recommendations and statistics. Here are some of the more interesting items I found - - Of the top 150 H-1B employers, 24 were deemed H-1B dependent (a high percentage of workers on the H-1B) and 9 had prior H-1B violations. - Real earnings growth for US workers in occupations with proportionately more H-1B workers - particularly IT - was actually much stronger than the general US worker. - Engineers and IT professionals on H-1Bs were more than twice as likely as their US counterparts to have advanced degrees. - The proportion of...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/01/government-accountability-office-releases-report-on-h-1b-program.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/01/government-accountability-office-releases-report-on-h-1b-program.html)
more...
makeup her light brown hair.
atlgc
04-23 03:21 PM
Hello
I am EB3 and recently got my h1-b extension from 10th to 13 year and got approved without any RFE in 2months from VSC.approved in 3rd week of january.i am working for the same company since 2002 an I am permanent employee not consultant and no clients
Now all the sudden out of nowhere an immigration inspector came to our workplace and asked details about my work, salary. They didn't ask anything else. They asked about me but I was working from home that day an per hr its related to h1-b but they have no clue as i am the only one non immigrant in 1600 employees
Is this common?
Should I enquiry with uscis? If so how
Since I worked from home that day and didn�t meet me, will there be an issue?
Should I be concerned anything or just forget about it. Any of your experiences thoughts are much advised
thanks
I am EB3 and recently got my h1-b extension from 10th to 13 year and got approved without any RFE in 2months from VSC.approved in 3rd week of january.i am working for the same company since 2002 an I am permanent employee not consultant and no clients
Now all the sudden out of nowhere an immigration inspector came to our workplace and asked details about my work, salary. They didn't ask anything else. They asked about me but I was working from home that day an per hr its related to h1-b but they have no clue as i am the only one non immigrant in 1600 employees
Is this common?
Should I enquiry with uscis? If so how
Since I worked from home that day and didn�t meet me, will there be an issue?
Should I be concerned anything or just forget about it. Any of your experiences thoughts are much advised
thanks
girlfriend Light Brown Hair Blonde
Macaca
06-05 07:40 PM
Discontent Over Iraq Increasing, Poll Finds (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/04/AR2007060401230.html) Americans Also Unhappy With Congress, By Dan Balz and Jon Cohen (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/dan+balz+and+jon+cohen/), Washington Post Staff Writers, Tuesday, June 5, 2007
Growing frustration with the performance of the Democratic Congress, combined with widespread public pessimism over President Bush's temporary troop buildup in Iraq, has left satisfaction with the overall direction of the country at its lowest point in more than a decade, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
Almost six in 10 Americans said they do not think the additional troops sent to Iraq since the beginning of the year will help restore civil order there, and 53 percent -- a new high in Post-ABC News polls -- said they do not believe that the war has contributed to the long-term security of the United States.
Disapproval of Bush's performance in office remains high, but the poll highlighted growing disapproval of the new Democratic majority in Congress. Just 39 percent said they approve of the job Congress is doing, down from 44 percent in April, when the new Congress was about 100 days into its term. More significant, approval of congressional Democrats dropped 10 percentage points over that same period, from 54 percent to 44 percent.
Much of that drop was fueled by lower approval ratings of the Democrats in Congress among strong opponents of the war, independents and liberal Democrats. While independents were evenly split on the Democrats in Congress in April (49 percent approved, 48 percent disapproved), now 37 percent said they approved and 54 percent disapproved. Among liberal Democrats, approval of congressional Democrats dropped 18 points.
Bush's overall job-approval rating stands at 35 percent, unchanged from April.
Many Democratic activists have complained that the 2006 midterm election results represented a call for a course change in Iraq and that so far the Democratic-controlled Congress has failed to deliver.
Deep public skepticism about Iraq, concerns about the Democrats and Bush, and near-record-high gasoline prices appear to have combined to sour the overall mood in the country. In the new poll, 73 percent of Americans said the country is pretty seriously on the wrong track, while 25 percent said things are going in the right direction.
That gap is marginally wider than it was at the beginning of the year and represents the most gloomy expression of public sentiment since January 1996, when a face-off between President Bill Clinton and a Republican-controlled Congress over the budget led to an extended shutdown of the federal government.
Among the nearly three-quarters of Americans expressing a pessimistic viewpoint, about one in five blamed the war for their negative outlook, and about the same ratio mentioned the economy, gas prices, jobs or debt as the main reason for their dissatisfaction with the country's direction. Eleven percent cited "problems with Bush," and another 11 percent said "everything" led them to their negative opinion.
The new poll showed that Americans have recalibrated their view of who is taking the lead in Washington. Earlier this year, majorities of Americans said they believed that the Democrats were taking the initiative in the capital, but now there is an even split, with 43 percent saying Bush is taking the stronger leadership role and 45 percent saying the Democrats are.
That shift occurred across the political spectrum. In April, 59 percent of independents said Democrats were taking a stronger role, but that figure has dropped 15 points, to 44 percent.
The political machinations over the Iraq war funding bill have been the dominant news event in Congress for much of the spring, and the Democrats' removal of the provision linking funding to a withdrawal deadline came shortly before the poll was taken.
In April, the public, by a 25-point margin, trusted the Democrats over Bush to handle the situation in Iraq. In this poll, Democrats maintained an advantage, but by 16 points. There has been an erosion of support for Democrats on this issue, but not a corresponding movement to Bush. Among independents, trust for the Democrats is down eight points, mostly because of a six-point bump in the percentage who said they trust "neither."
Congressional Democrats also are preferred over Bush -- whose own approval ratings remain near career lows -- on immigration (by 17 percentage points), the economy (by 18 points) and even, albeit narrowly, on handling the U.S. campaign against terrorism (by six points).
But it is the war in Iraq -- the most important issue in the 2006 campaign -- that has the most potential to reshape the political landscape.
Overall, 61 percent in this poll said the war was not worth fighting, and nearly two-thirds said the United States is not making significant progress restoring civil order in Iraq. However, there is no such general agreement about what to do.
In this poll, 55 percent -- a new high -- said the number of U.S. military forces in Iraq should be decreased, but only 15 percent advocated an immediate withdrawal of American troops. An additional 12 percent said U.S. forces should be out of Iraq sometime this year.
Since the Iraqi parliamentary elections in November 2005, consistent majorities of Americans have said U.S. troops should be drawn down; support for an immediate, complete withdrawal has also remained relatively stable, never exceeding two in 10. And there similarly has been little change across party lines: 25 percent of the Democrats surveyed wanted all American military forces out of Iraq now, compared with 13 percent of independents and 6 percent of Republicans, with all percentages about the same as in late 2005. Support for the immediate removal of U.S. forces peaked at 32 percent among African Americans.
Public attitudes about the size of U.S. military forces in Iraq and about the war more generally are closely related to views about the centrality of the situation in Iraq to the broader battle against terrorism, another flashpoint between Bush and congressional Democrats. (In this poll, nearly six in 10 agreed with the Democratic position that the two are separate issues.) Overall, more than seven in 10 of those who said Iraq is an essential component of the terrorism fight wanted U.S. troop levels in Iraq to be increased or kept the same, while more than seven in 10 of those seeing the issues as separate thought that some or all troops should be withdrawn. Among independents who said the United States can succeed against terrorism without winning in Iraq, 70 percent supported decreasing troop levels, compared with 23 percent of those who saw victory in Iraq as pivotal.
This Post-ABC News poll was conducted by telephone May 29 to June 1 among a random sample of 1,205 adults. Results from the full poll have a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points. Sampling error margins are higher for subgroups.
Washington Post-ABC News Poll (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_060307.html)
The Washington Post - ABC News Poll: Iraq War Apprehension (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/06/05/GR2007060500108.html)
Growing frustration with the performance of the Democratic Congress, combined with widespread public pessimism over President Bush's temporary troop buildup in Iraq, has left satisfaction with the overall direction of the country at its lowest point in more than a decade, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
Almost six in 10 Americans said they do not think the additional troops sent to Iraq since the beginning of the year will help restore civil order there, and 53 percent -- a new high in Post-ABC News polls -- said they do not believe that the war has contributed to the long-term security of the United States.
Disapproval of Bush's performance in office remains high, but the poll highlighted growing disapproval of the new Democratic majority in Congress. Just 39 percent said they approve of the job Congress is doing, down from 44 percent in April, when the new Congress was about 100 days into its term. More significant, approval of congressional Democrats dropped 10 percentage points over that same period, from 54 percent to 44 percent.
Much of that drop was fueled by lower approval ratings of the Democrats in Congress among strong opponents of the war, independents and liberal Democrats. While independents were evenly split on the Democrats in Congress in April (49 percent approved, 48 percent disapproved), now 37 percent said they approved and 54 percent disapproved. Among liberal Democrats, approval of congressional Democrats dropped 18 points.
Bush's overall job-approval rating stands at 35 percent, unchanged from April.
Many Democratic activists have complained that the 2006 midterm election results represented a call for a course change in Iraq and that so far the Democratic-controlled Congress has failed to deliver.
Deep public skepticism about Iraq, concerns about the Democrats and Bush, and near-record-high gasoline prices appear to have combined to sour the overall mood in the country. In the new poll, 73 percent of Americans said the country is pretty seriously on the wrong track, while 25 percent said things are going in the right direction.
That gap is marginally wider than it was at the beginning of the year and represents the most gloomy expression of public sentiment since January 1996, when a face-off between President Bill Clinton and a Republican-controlled Congress over the budget led to an extended shutdown of the federal government.
Among the nearly three-quarters of Americans expressing a pessimistic viewpoint, about one in five blamed the war for their negative outlook, and about the same ratio mentioned the economy, gas prices, jobs or debt as the main reason for their dissatisfaction with the country's direction. Eleven percent cited "problems with Bush," and another 11 percent said "everything" led them to their negative opinion.
The new poll showed that Americans have recalibrated their view of who is taking the lead in Washington. Earlier this year, majorities of Americans said they believed that the Democrats were taking the initiative in the capital, but now there is an even split, with 43 percent saying Bush is taking the stronger leadership role and 45 percent saying the Democrats are.
That shift occurred across the political spectrum. In April, 59 percent of independents said Democrats were taking a stronger role, but that figure has dropped 15 points, to 44 percent.
The political machinations over the Iraq war funding bill have been the dominant news event in Congress for much of the spring, and the Democrats' removal of the provision linking funding to a withdrawal deadline came shortly before the poll was taken.
In April, the public, by a 25-point margin, trusted the Democrats over Bush to handle the situation in Iraq. In this poll, Democrats maintained an advantage, but by 16 points. There has been an erosion of support for Democrats on this issue, but not a corresponding movement to Bush. Among independents, trust for the Democrats is down eight points, mostly because of a six-point bump in the percentage who said they trust "neither."
Congressional Democrats also are preferred over Bush -- whose own approval ratings remain near career lows -- on immigration (by 17 percentage points), the economy (by 18 points) and even, albeit narrowly, on handling the U.S. campaign against terrorism (by six points).
But it is the war in Iraq -- the most important issue in the 2006 campaign -- that has the most potential to reshape the political landscape.
Overall, 61 percent in this poll said the war was not worth fighting, and nearly two-thirds said the United States is not making significant progress restoring civil order in Iraq. However, there is no such general agreement about what to do.
In this poll, 55 percent -- a new high -- said the number of U.S. military forces in Iraq should be decreased, but only 15 percent advocated an immediate withdrawal of American troops. An additional 12 percent said U.S. forces should be out of Iraq sometime this year.
Since the Iraqi parliamentary elections in November 2005, consistent majorities of Americans have said U.S. troops should be drawn down; support for an immediate, complete withdrawal has also remained relatively stable, never exceeding two in 10. And there similarly has been little change across party lines: 25 percent of the Democrats surveyed wanted all American military forces out of Iraq now, compared with 13 percent of independents and 6 percent of Republicans, with all percentages about the same as in late 2005. Support for the immediate removal of U.S. forces peaked at 32 percent among African Americans.
Public attitudes about the size of U.S. military forces in Iraq and about the war more generally are closely related to views about the centrality of the situation in Iraq to the broader battle against terrorism, another flashpoint between Bush and congressional Democrats. (In this poll, nearly six in 10 agreed with the Democratic position that the two are separate issues.) Overall, more than seven in 10 of those who said Iraq is an essential component of the terrorism fight wanted U.S. troop levels in Iraq to be increased or kept the same, while more than seven in 10 of those seeing the issues as separate thought that some or all troops should be withdrawn. Among independents who said the United States can succeed against terrorism without winning in Iraq, 70 percent supported decreasing troop levels, compared with 23 percent of those who saw victory in Iraq as pivotal.
This Post-ABC News poll was conducted by telephone May 29 to June 1 among a random sample of 1,205 adults. Results from the full poll have a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points. Sampling error margins are higher for subgroups.
Washington Post-ABC News Poll (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/polls/postpoll_060307.html)
The Washington Post - ABC News Poll: Iraq War Apprehension (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/06/05/GR2007060500108.html)
hairstyles Brown Hair With Golden
gezzus234
03-12 12:54 AM
supose u cood then import the swf into a new flash file n then play wit it?
jjlittlegiant
01-02 10:14 PM
H1B Transfer is not equal to H1B Renewal.
H1B transfer: when you change your job, you transfer your H1B visa to the new employer.
H1B Renewal: when you stay in the same company for 3 years, you need to file h1B renewal for the 2nd duration of 3 years.
H1B transfer: when you change your job, you transfer your H1B visa to the new employer.
H1B Renewal: when you stay in the same company for 3 years, you need to file h1B renewal for the 2nd duration of 3 years.
tarunsri
02-28 02:34 PM
Dear forum members,
I have a question regarding transferring my H1b. My scenario is i am on my 7th year of my H1b and it is expiring on Oct 2007. My current employer will be filing an extension of 3 years based on my approved I-140 in the month of June 2007. If everything goes well i will get my three year extension(2007-2010) by Aug 2007.
Question is
1) If i get a new job opportunity after 3 year approval ( start date will be Oct 2007) can i transfer it to my new employer by aug or i have to wait till the start date of H1 approval?
2) When can i start working for the new company?
Any response will be appreciated.
Thanks
sriram
I have a question regarding transferring my H1b. My scenario is i am on my 7th year of my H1b and it is expiring on Oct 2007. My current employer will be filing an extension of 3 years based on my approved I-140 in the month of June 2007. If everything goes well i will get my three year extension(2007-2010) by Aug 2007.
Question is
1) If i get a new job opportunity after 3 year approval ( start date will be Oct 2007) can i transfer it to my new employer by aug or i have to wait till the start date of H1 approval?
2) When can i start working for the new company?
Any response will be appreciated.
Thanks
sriram
No comments:
Post a Comment