javadeveloper
10-09 10:58 AM
My wife did not have SSN when her FP was done. I would not suggest writing ITIN either.
But must write the A# from FP notice onto the form.
But I believe my wife used her ITIN# in place of SSN in some other GC related forms , Is this going to be an Issue??
But must write the A# from FP notice onto the form.
But I believe my wife used her ITIN# in place of SSN in some other GC related forms , Is this going to be an Issue??
wallpaper Kelly will shoot the video
Blog Feeds
12-15 12:20 PM
The fine folks at NAFSA have issued a report reminding people why the US needs to retain its commitment to international education and needs to fix many aspects of the current system. This sums up the importance of the subject: All prudent steps must be taken to prevent another act of mass terrorism on American soil. But a policy based in fear, that causes us to turn away from the world, is profoundly inimical to American security�because openness is part of security. The United States needs international students, professors, researchers, scientists, and future leaders coming to this country to further...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/12/nafsa-report-make-sure-cir-doesnt-leave-out-needed-student-visa-reforms.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/12/nafsa-report-make-sure-cir-doesnt-leave-out-needed-student-visa-reforms.html)
cmfirst
07-19 04:23 PM
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/jul2007/db20070718_012859.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index _businessweek+exclusives
2011 Kelly Rowland hops on as guest
chil3
04-13 01:48 PM
Spillover is minus? How's that possible - genius? So - are they revoking GCs already issued?
Talking abt Spillover...not already allocated..
Talking abt Spillover...not already allocated..
more...
smithshn
05-07 09:01 AM
Program is the instance of the form.
It is indirectly inherited of your form.
And it is the class of itself.
It is indirectly inherited of your form.
And it is the class of itself.
fromnaija
10-26 01:41 PM
105-year-old realizes dream of citizenship (http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/california/la-me-naturalize26oct26,1,6009025.story?coll=la-headlines-pe-california)
The children obtained a green card for their mother and brought her to Palm Desert six years ago, after their father died in Tehran.
She is luckier than most of us as she became a citizen in only six years! Most of us here are still waiting for GC after 10 years!
The children obtained a green card for their mother and brought her to Palm Desert six years ago, after their father died in Tehran.
She is luckier than most of us as she became a citizen in only six years! Most of us here are still waiting for GC after 10 years!
more...
kumar1981
09-18 10:15 AM
Any inputs guyz!
2010 Download Kelly Rowland feat
Blog Feeds
10-25 11:40 PM
How Senator David Vitter (R-LA) is still in Congress after his prostitute scandal escapes me. If his latest legislative effort is some kind of attempt to redeem himself with voters, he's living in a very warped world. Vitter is proposing to cut off funding for the 2010 Census unless the survey checks the citizenship of all people responding. Even if you didn't think it was bad public policy designed to exploit anti-immigrant passions, there are three very, very big practical problems with the idea. First, it would cost a fortune to make the change at this late stage - upwards...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/10/impractical-and-unconstitutional.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/10/impractical-and-unconstitutional.html)
more...
isthereawayout
05-29 08:17 AM
For a EB2 position, that requires a MS with no alternate qualification accepted:
1. Does the business necessity need to show how the job duties match the course work during MS or why the job duties are needed for the company?
2. Do we need to send the business necessity at the time of applying for PERM or only when audited.
Thanks!
1. Does the business necessity need to show how the job duties match the course work during MS or why the job duties are needed for the company?
2. Do we need to send the business necessity at the time of applying for PERM or only when audited.
Thanks!
hair Kelly Rowland probably needed
Macaca
08-05 08:12 AM
A Bad Deal Gets Worse (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/05/opinion/05sun2.html) August 5, 2007
President Bush is understandably desperate for some kind of foreign policy success. But that cannot justify sacrificing his principled stand against weapons proliferation to seal a nuclear cooperation deal with India. The agreement could end up benefiting New Delhi�s weapons program as much as its pursuit of nuclear power.
The deal was deeply flawed from the start. And it has been made even worse by a newly negotiated companion agreement that lays out the technical details for nuclear commerce. Congress should reject the agreement and demand that the administration, or its successor, negotiate a new one that does not undermine efforts to restrain the spread of nuclear weapons.
Any agreement needs to honor the principle Mr. Bush set forth in 2004: that countries do not need to make their own nuclear fuel, or reprocess their spent fuel, to operate effective nuclear energy programs. The technology can be all too easily diverted to make fuel for a nuclear weapon.
Unfortunately, Mr. Bush�s accord with India jettisoned that essential principle. Washington capitulated to India�s nuclear establishment and endorsed continued reprocessing. And while United States law calls for nuclear cooperation to end if India detonates another weapon, the agreement makes no explicit mention of that requirement � while it promises that Washington will acquiesce, if not assist, in India�s efforts to find other fuel suppliers.
Bringing India � which never signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty � in from the cold is not a bad idea. It is the world�s most populous democracy, with a dynamic economy. And its record on nonproliferation � aside from its own diversion of civilian technology to its once-secret weapons program � is pretty good. The problem is that the United States got very little back. No promise to stop producing bomb-making material. No promise not to expand its arsenal. And no promise not to resume nuclear testing.
The message of all this is unmistakable: When it comes to nuclear proliferation, Washington�s only real policy is to reward its friends and punish its enemies. Suspicion of America�s motives around the world are high enough. America cannot afford another such blow to its credibility, especially when it is trying to rally international pressure against nuclear programs in Iran and North Korea.
The administration will argue that altering this agreement now would be a slap at India. But there is no good in compounding a bad deal. And there are better ways to deepen political and economic ties.
Congress accepted the administration�s arguments far too uncritically when it approved the first India-related nuclear legislation last December. It must now take a stand against the even more damaging companion agreement. At a time when far too many governments are re-examining their decision to forswear nuclear weapons, the United States should be shoring up the nuclear rules, not shredding them.
President Bush is understandably desperate for some kind of foreign policy success. But that cannot justify sacrificing his principled stand against weapons proliferation to seal a nuclear cooperation deal with India. The agreement could end up benefiting New Delhi�s weapons program as much as its pursuit of nuclear power.
The deal was deeply flawed from the start. And it has been made even worse by a newly negotiated companion agreement that lays out the technical details for nuclear commerce. Congress should reject the agreement and demand that the administration, or its successor, negotiate a new one that does not undermine efforts to restrain the spread of nuclear weapons.
Any agreement needs to honor the principle Mr. Bush set forth in 2004: that countries do not need to make their own nuclear fuel, or reprocess their spent fuel, to operate effective nuclear energy programs. The technology can be all too easily diverted to make fuel for a nuclear weapon.
Unfortunately, Mr. Bush�s accord with India jettisoned that essential principle. Washington capitulated to India�s nuclear establishment and endorsed continued reprocessing. And while United States law calls for nuclear cooperation to end if India detonates another weapon, the agreement makes no explicit mention of that requirement � while it promises that Washington will acquiesce, if not assist, in India�s efforts to find other fuel suppliers.
Bringing India � which never signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty � in from the cold is not a bad idea. It is the world�s most populous democracy, with a dynamic economy. And its record on nonproliferation � aside from its own diversion of civilian technology to its once-secret weapons program � is pretty good. The problem is that the United States got very little back. No promise to stop producing bomb-making material. No promise not to expand its arsenal. And no promise not to resume nuclear testing.
The message of all this is unmistakable: When it comes to nuclear proliferation, Washington�s only real policy is to reward its friends and punish its enemies. Suspicion of America�s motives around the world are high enough. America cannot afford another such blow to its credibility, especially when it is trying to rally international pressure against nuclear programs in Iran and North Korea.
The administration will argue that altering this agreement now would be a slap at India. But there is no good in compounding a bad deal. And there are better ways to deepen political and economic ties.
Congress accepted the administration�s arguments far too uncritically when it approved the first India-related nuclear legislation last December. It must now take a stand against the even more damaging companion agreement. At a time when far too many governments are re-examining their decision to forswear nuclear weapons, the United States should be shoring up the nuclear rules, not shredding them.
more...
pr_001
04-12 05:23 PM
Hi,
I am transferring my H1B from Employer A to B.
With Employer A, I had my recent H1B extension approved till Oct 31 2011.
I am going to have the period on this transfer as June 1 2009 - Oct 31 2011. (Which will 6 yrs in total on H1B status for me).
I have question on form I-129, "Requested Action" section.
Out of the following options, which one should I "Check":
1. Extend the stay of the person(s) since they now hold this status.
2. Amend the stay of the person(s) since they now hold this status.
Please let me know.
Thanks,
Prem.
I am transferring my H1B from Employer A to B.
With Employer A, I had my recent H1B extension approved till Oct 31 2011.
I am going to have the period on this transfer as June 1 2009 - Oct 31 2011. (Which will 6 yrs in total on H1B status for me).
I have question on form I-129, "Requested Action" section.
Out of the following options, which one should I "Check":
1. Extend the stay of the person(s) since they now hold this status.
2. Amend the stay of the person(s) since they now hold this status.
Please let me know.
Thanks,
Prem.
hot Kelly was recently at Roberto
dealsnet
03-04 08:32 PM
No way connected with Employment based.
You need to wait till your PD for brother sister to be current.
Hi
My I130 application (green card filed through my sister) was approved recently. Can I extend my currend H1B visa beyond six year term through this I130 approval.
Thanks alot
You need to wait till your PD for brother sister to be current.
Hi
My I130 application (green card filed through my sister) was approved recently. Can I extend my currend H1B visa beyond six year term through this I130 approval.
Thanks alot
more...
house tattoo Kelly Rowland is
maine_gc
08-20 12:59 PM
Is KY State Chapter active?
I live in Lexington, KY. Some one let me know the KY State Chapter details so that i can talk to the members
I live in Lexington, KY. Some one let me know the KY State Chapter details so that i can talk to the members
tattoo Video: Kelly Rowland ft.
BharatPremi
11-07 11:26 AM
http://www.foreignlaborcert.doleta.gov/pdf/backlog_faqs_10-31-07.pdf
more...
pictures Singer Kelly Rowland appeared
adham_a
04-16 11:29 AM
muahahahaha....goldorak.....that's how i used to call him....!!!! haha, good, but the guy is a bit too stretched....
thanks frost they guy is called dukefleed :p
bye
thanks frost they guy is called dukefleed :p
bye
dresses Kelly Rowland promo pic for
Rym
01-25 08:06 PM
HI,
I am in US and have changed a job recently (changed status from L1 to H1 while in US). I plan to travel to india soon in Feb 2010. My passport is valid till March 2011 and my H1b approval is till 2012. Will this be a problem for me when I go for stamping in India.
- rym
I am in US and have changed a job recently (changed status from L1 to H1 while in US). I plan to travel to india soon in Feb 2010. My passport is valid till March 2011 and my H1b approval is till 2012. Will this be a problem for me when I go for stamping in India.
- rym
more...
makeup kelly rowland motivation video
neel_gump
07-07 11:11 AM
Form AR-11 asks for the date my stay in the United States will expire. What date should I use? Currently, I am on working on EAD (I-485 pending) and last entered US on AP.
girlfriend Kelly Rowland#39;s new video
GCisLottery
07-18 11:25 AM
Listen to this: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5564537
Two women who have been longtime employees in a Pittsburgh federal building, as cafeteria workers, are back on the job. They had been fired and told they failed to pass their national security background check.
In the middle you will hear:
Someone "misread" the social security number
This is not related to GC, but gives a glimpse of the quality of security background check. May be compared to FBI name check.
Two women who have been longtime employees in a Pittsburgh federal building, as cafeteria workers, are back on the job. They had been fired and told they failed to pass their national security background check.
In the middle you will hear:
Someone "misread" the social security number
This is not related to GC, but gives a glimpse of the quality of security background check. May be compared to FBI name check.
hairstyles Ramp;B star Kelly Rowland
gparr
April 10th, 2007, 01:53 PM
This is the list of lenses manufactured by Konica/Minolta:
http://ca.konicaminolta.com/products/consumer/digital_camera/slr/maxxum-7d/08.html
Third-party lenses, i.e., Sigma, Tamron, usually offer mounts for the major camera brands.
B&H Photo's site is very easy to use. www.bhphotovideo.com
Gary
http://ca.konicaminolta.com/products/consumer/digital_camera/slr/maxxum-7d/08.html
Third-party lenses, i.e., Sigma, Tamron, usually offer mounts for the major camera brands.
B&H Photo's site is very easy to use. www.bhphotovideo.com
Gary